How it begins...(5)

Author: Adam Fok


I am with Auknife's proposal concerning the rules about previous preparation.


Before promoting this so-called reading group to others, we as the participants at the foundation stage need to set a good environment/rules/model etc for this group. Those rules proposed by Auknife make a difference between a blow-water group and reading group. I also hope that everyone can contribute and get something from the meetings. 


At this stage we don't have to worry about "barring audiences due to the need of prior preparation and demanding rules". Let's see it in another way. Once we set up good examples, words travel fast and interested ppl will surely join. And I am confident that we founders can influence other participants; let them know how a reading group should be run. Note that the rules are set to maintain the functionality of the meeting rather than barring newcomers to join; they are required to prepare in advance for a small amount of time only. In my opinion good attitude is the only prerequisite.


Also setting strict rules (though from my perspective they are not strict at all) do not imply that the meeting will be too formal/academic/etc. The rules are set so as to make sure everyone does prepare sth before we meet, for the sake of the atmosphere and potential gain of the meeting. The topic itself can be informal but preferrably thought-provoking. 


All in all I hope this meeting will be different from friend's chat, which we can always do impromptu during free time. And I agree that auknife's rules can achieve this goal. 


Concerning the rules about no. of presentation each member should hold: I have no opinion on that. But I guess for those who are willing to join this group are also willing to hold the meeting right?